You've probably seen it. Four boxes, two questions: is it urgent, is it important? It looks great on a whiteboard, and the first time you sort your tasks into it, it feels like you've finally got a grip on things.
Then Tuesday happens. Thirty new things arrive, each one needs its own little debate about which box it goes in, and by Thursday the matrix is a nice idea you had once.
If that's you, the matrix isn't the problem, and neither are you. It's just a better tool for thinking than for running a day. Here's a simpler system that asks one question instead of two.
The Eisenhower Matrix makes you judge every task on two things, urgency and importance. Now / Next / Later only asks one: when will you do it? Today goes in Now, the next few things go in Next, everything else goes in Later. It's easier to keep up because deciding "when" is much quicker than deciding "how important".
What the Eisenhower Matrix is
The idea goes back to a 1954 speech by Dwight D. Eisenhower, where he quoted a line about urgent problems rarely being important, and important ones rarely being urgent. Stephen Covey turned it into the four-quadrant grid in The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, and it's been on productivity blogs ever since.
- Urgent and important: do it now.
- Important, not urgent: schedule it.
- Urgent, not important: delegate it.
- Neither: drop it.
The idea behind it is good. Most of us spend our days on things that feel urgent and neglect the things that actually matter. The trouble starts when you try to use the grid every day.
Why it's hard to stick with
Every task needs two judgment calls
Is "reply to Sofia" urgent? Sort of. Important? Depends. Multiply that by forty tasks and you're spending real energy classifying work instead of doing it. Decisions get tiring, and a system that asks for two per task is one you'll quietly stop using.
Most people have no one to delegate to
A quarter of the matrix assumes you have someone to hand things to. If you're a freelancer, a student, or just a person with a life, that box mostly turns into a second "do it now" pile with extra guilt attached.
It tells you what matters, not what's next
Say you've got six tasks in "urgent and important". Which one do you start? The matrix doesn't say. It sorts, but it doesn't sequence, and it doesn't stop the top box from filling up.
Priorities move, the grid doesn't
Something "important but not urgent" on Monday is often urgent by Friday. Keeping the grid honest means re-sorting it all the time, which is exactly the kind of upkeep that makes people give up on to-do lists in the first place.
A simpler alternative: Now / Next / Later
Now / Next / Later swaps both questions for one you can answer in a second: when am I doing this?
- Now: what you're doing today. Keep it to three to five things. If it doesn't fit, it isn't happening today, and that's fine.
- Next: what's lined up for when Now is done. Deciding this ahead of time means you never sit there wondering what to pick up.
- Later: everything else. Ideas, someday tasks, things you don't want to forget. Out of the way until you need them.
Importance doesn't go away. It just gets handled where it belongs: when you decide what earns a place in Now. You're still asking what matters most, but you only ask it about a few things, once a day, not about every task as it comes in.
"You don't need to know how important everything is. You need to know what you're doing next."
How the four boxes map to three lanes
| Eisenhower quadrant | Where it goes in Now / Next / Later |
|---|---|
| Urgent and important | Now |
| Important, not urgent | Next, or Later with a plan to pull it up. This is the box the matrix is famous for protecting, so check Later once a week. |
| Urgent, not important | Now if it really has to be you, otherwise hand it off or say no |
| Neither | Later, or just delete it. Later isn't a guilt pile. |
How to switch in ten minutes
- Write down everything on your mind, without sorting it.
- Pick the three to five things that have to happen today. That's Now.
- Pick the next three or four you'd start once those are done. That's Next.
- Everything else goes in Later. Delete anything you already know you'll never do.
- Tomorrow morning, look at Next and Later and promote what's ready. That's your whole daily review.
That last step is the one that makes it stick. I wrote a longer version of it in how to plan your day in under 5 minutes, and there's a full breakdown of the method in the Now / Next / Later system.
When the matrix is still the better tool
I don't think the Eisenhower Matrix is useless. It's great for a weekly step back: laying out everything on your plate and asking what really matters. And if you manage a team, the "delegate" box is real and valuable.
They also work well together. Use the matrix once a week to think, and Now / Next / Later every day to act.
Quick questions
What is a simple alternative to the Eisenhower Matrix?
Now / Next / Later. Instead of rating tasks on urgency and importance, you put each one in a lane by when you'll do it: today, next, or later.
Why is the Eisenhower Matrix hard to use every day?
It asks two judgment calls per task, it assumes you can delegate, and it doesn't tell you which task to start first. Keeping it up to date takes more effort than most people can sustain.
Can I use both?
Yes. A lot of people use the matrix for a weekly review and a time-based list like Now / Next / Later for daily planning.
TodoNxt puts Now, Nxt and Ltr in your Mac menu bar, one click or one shortcut away. One-time purchase, no subscription.
Get TodoNxt for €2.99 →